Автор работы: Пользователь скрыл имя, 14 Марта 2013 в 12:54, доклад
t Theme: in essence answers the question what the story is about. There are stories about family relations, love, friendship, or on the anti-war theme.
It shouid not be confused with the message or the main idea: a broad topic like life and death or some aspect of the writer's philosophy.
Short Summary: A brief and comprehensive presentation of facts, essential points, a concise commenting on events described in the story,
Plot: is what happening in a story. It is the relationship of the incidents to one
Commenting on a Short Story .
t Theme: in essence answers the question what the story is about. There are stories about family relations, love, friendship, or on the anti-war theme.
It shouid not be confused with the message or the main idea: a broad topic like life and death or some aspect of the writer's philosophy.
another in a meaningful pattern of action and movement beginning with the exposition or introduction of the main situation, scene and character. It includes the setting which links the plot to a specific time and place. It plays an active part in presenting the whole story, establishing mood and may even reveal the aspects of the protagonist character, Then follow complications or development of a story, a climax, or turning point at which the action reaches its peak and moves towards a solution and the denouement, or resolution. There are different ways in which fiction writers develop plots. In some stories the incidents occur in strict chronological order, they follow one another according to a time sequence, moving from the beginning of the action to the end. In others the time sequence may be rearranged. The authors may present the conclusion first and then work toward an explanation of it or introduce information about the past relevant to the present, without interrupting the narration for a long time (flashback).
Another method of establishing unity in a story is foreshadowing: hinting what is to come through an incident, symbolic detail, dialogue or the title.
IV. Narrative Method: The first person narration. The story may be told by the main
character (the protagonist) or by a minor character.
This type of narration has immediacy, authority and naturalness, the speaker persuades you of the truth of the story because he is the eyewitness. However, disadvantages of first-person narrators are that they can be biased observers or participants who reveal only one aspect of situations and may be unreliable or unsympathetic and opposed to the values implicit in the story. The third-person omniscient author reproduces the characters and comments on their actions, analyzing and summarizing them. The third-person observer-author speaks in a neutral fashion, from outside the action, merely recording the speech and actions of the characters. The weakness of the third-person narration is that the author, or narrator, reports everything at second-hand and does not always reveal actions in a direct way.
Characters: in
a story, there are different types of characters: a major, main
character, or protagonist, and minor characters: a foil, with distinctly opposing
features to another character. The characters may be described directly
or indirectly
-through their actions, speech, psychological portrayal, appearance,
environment or
their names. They may be involved in conflicts: internal (an individual against himself, an individual against
environment, another individual), to individualize, particularize and
specify the characters, the writer may resort to various stylistic
devices and means of expressiveness relying on his power to make his
words convey more than they actually say. The character may also reveal
himself in inner monologue or in a stream of conscience. In the first,
the character's thoughts come in forth in orderly fashion. The purpose
is to show what the character is thinking. In the stream of conscience
the protagonist's thoughts come forth as a daydream, with no logical
order. The purpose is to show how, as well as what the character is
thinking.
Commenting | |
on a Brief Literary Composition | |
Plan and Questionnaire | |
I. Type of Writing |
Is it a descriptive (narrative, argumentative) essay, |
a piece of popular scientific prose or a piece of | |
scholarly writing (written by scholars for | |
scholars)? | |
II. The Subject- |
What is the text about? What is its central theme? |
Matter |
|
III. The Structure |
Does it contain all formal elements of structure: |
of the Text |
an introduction: the main part (the body), the |
conclusion? | |
To what conclusion does the author come? | |
What is the role of the title? | |
IV. Chain of |
What techniques did the author use to achieve his |
Reasoning |
aim? |
Are there sufficient arguments, details, examples | |
I |
to support the main points? |
What is gained by inclusion of figures, dates, | |
statistic data? | |
Quotations and references are often chosen to help | |
show attitude or convey different ideas. Are there | |
any? | |
V. Style Language |
Is the language of the text literary or colloquial, |
formal or informal? Is it expressive? | |
List means of expressiveness at different language | |
levels and comment on their function (role). | |
VI. Conclusion |
Final evaluation of the text should be based on the |
answers to the following questions: | |
What was the author's purpose? | |
How well did he succeed in fulfilling it? |