Автор работы: Пользователь скрыл имя, 26 Ноября 2013 в 21:35, реферат
English has never been brought up by their own will not go to the conflict and try to avoid it , even if it persistently imposed . In addition , English etiquette calls to abandon the sharp tone of communication, as well as too active displays of emotion during speech. So, excessive emotionality is considered a breach of etiquette in England , but the flattery - quite appropriate phenomenon in the culture. Do not be surprised if you are in this country , with or without reason to be showered with compliments - just this once again requires English etiquette . English etiquette educates citizens of the United Kingdom traits such as modesty and restraint.
Криворізький професійний
транспортно-металургійний
На тему:
Учениці группы №19 (ОЕЕМ)
Уманцівої Світлани
Кривий Ріг 2013 р.
The etiquette is on what the English culture was created and based. Rules of behavior of the nobility and commoners from the medieval we say lies accurately were observed and even were registered in special weighty literary volume. Some rules of etiquette from the United Kingdom removed to other cultures and got accustomed there.
English has never been brought up by their own will not go to the conflict and try to avoid it , even if it persistently imposed . In addition , English etiquette calls to abandon the sharp tone of communication, as well as too active displays of emotion during speech. So, excessive emotionality is considered a breach of etiquette in England , but the flattery - quite appropriate phenomenon in the culture. Do not be surprised if you are in this country , with or without reason to be showered with compliments - just this once again requires English etiquette . English etiquette educates citizens of the United Kingdom traits such as modesty and restraint. These gentlemen and ladies likely to belittle their dignity to boast that. Etiquette the table impeccably observed in England . Even when you are at home , a person must use precisely the cutlery which are designed for a particular dish. Communication at the table must necessarily be universal : English etiquette forbids whisper with a neighbor .
English culture of behavior does not involve constant shaking hands : they are only relevant when meeting. In addition , English etiquette forbids kissing a woman's hand and give her compliments in the presence of unauthorized persons.In England, like to joke , so the humor in this country do not take offense . Courtyard of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of England is perhaps the last bastion of refined manners , etiquette and protocol. No other institution in the world that could be justifiably proud of strict observance of the rules obrascheniya.Obedinennoe Kingdom does not have a monopoly on royal authority of etiquette and traditions inherent in the ancient British throne. In fact, by the monarchs of the world are turning in the same manner as the members of the family of Queen Elizabeth. Each country has its own unique culture , tradition and national etiquette . Every nation has its own distinctive features that reflect the essence of the nation, as well as your mindset , which allows to perceive the world through the eyes of a certain cultury. Difference representative of what is called etiquette , is a combination of formal rules of behavior in predetermined situations with common sense , rationality embedded in them content.
The practical importance of etiquette is that it allows people to effortlessly use the existing forms of common courtesy to communicate with different groups of people and at different levels.
Fundamentals of etiquette are simple. They are: of speech , in a highly sought after label of care , the ability to listen to the speaker, to provide a service in need of it.Etiquette today (modern etiquette) paints the behavior of people at home, at work, in public places and on the street, at a party and at various official events - receptions, ceremonies and negotiations.
The basic rules of etiquette of clothes first of all concern to women and they are as follows:
1 . All moderately
For members of royal family there is one basic rule: there shouldn't be nothing shouting and provocative. Elegance on the first place. So any deep cuts. Dresses always have to close shoulders. To open shoulders it is admissible only on evening action, but in that case long gloves have to hide part of a hand. The ideal skirt has to touch knees or to be slightly higher. About miniskirts, of course, even speech can't be.
2 . Practical case
It is recommended to put on a sheath dress, but it shouldn't be too narrow. In the royal protocol there is such rule, mainly, because of that the disobedient wind didn't lift a skirt of a dress and didn't bare those parts of royal bodies which have to be hidden (That, for example, happened to the duchess Cambridge)
3 . The lady in stockings
In public places of the lady are obliged to appear in stockings. Corporal color or light gray, without patterns. Such stockings don't draw attention to feet that is important during actions when it is necessary to stand long.
4 . Not striking heels
The footwear has to be imperceptible, classical with closed and not many being narrowed cape. The protocol doesn't recommend to put on footwear with too high and narrow heels. The queen has to symbolize stability and confidence. And how the queen who is unsteady on high hairpins will look?
5 . Free hand
At a bag choice the preference without fail should be given to a clutch or a strict handbag on a chain that at least it the hand remained free: the representative of royal family has to shake hands with citizens and welcome them from a balcony, waving a hand.
6 . Luxury only small doses
The clothes have to be sewed from qualitative natural materials (the denim, of course, isn't considered at all as possible option). Exception – fur. It is considered too binding and magnificent therefore the protocol doesn't recommend fur, except for special cases. However the fur collar on a coat is considered norm.
The fur as an accessory is admissible. But a fur coat it is too smart.
7 . Any black
Black color for members of royal family practically a taboo. Black it is intended only for mourning actions. It is considered that the tradition of color in clothes was entered by the Queen-mother during World War II: the color clothes she wanted to add to British of pleasure and optimism. If members of royal family are published in clothes of dark color, they choose dark blue or dark and sulfur color.
The first official action of future princess Diana after engagement with prince Charles became an example of violation of the rule "Any black". Then during a solemn dinner it appeared in the black dress baring shoulders. Toilet of the princess subjected to sharp criticism.
8 . Truncate a mane
Recommendations touch also hair. They have to be or so long that they could be collected in a bunch, or - short. Only this way the wind won't be able constantly to blow off hair and to close them a face that in photos looks not so attractively.
9 . More carefully with accessories
Also jewelry and a make-up have to be strict. Wedding rings are recommended. It is possible to put on, for example, a pearl necklace or a brooch in the afternoon. In the evening the tiara, more expressive necklace or a necklace, and also a bracelet is allowed. In a make-up there is under a ban a red lipstick, and also dark and too bright eye shadow.
Technically there are two "a seniority order" members of royal family - one the general and one separate for ladies. Second (ladies') was copied after the introduction in Camilla's royal family of the duchess Kornuollsky.
On a traditional order, Camilla as the spouse of the successor of a throne, has to be the second lady after the queen. But Elizabeth changed an order so that four ladies (Anna, Alexander, venerable lady Ogilvy and Beatrice and Evgenia Yorkskiye) given rise by princesses, became above Camilla on a rank.
To members of royal family to choose clothes not so simply. They can't simply open a case and choose that will please. Strict rules of etiquette in clothes concern all. Including queens.
The principle of inheritance in royal family
The act of a succession was adopted by parliament of England in 1701 and provides that first of all the throne passes to male successors.
Queen Elizabeth II ascended to a throne only because her father, king George VI, had no sons; if it had a brother, even younger, the crown would pass to him. Besides a priority of male successors, the Act of a succession provides that the Catholic or the person who is married to the Catholic can't become the king or the queen of England.
Thus the law formally doesn't forbid members of a royal surname to marry adherents of other religions or atheists.
Conversations on change of an order of a succession in Great Britain were had since the beginning of the 1980th years. However this idea didn't find support at the government of Great Britain.
In 2011 for law reduction in compliance with modern public standards of gender equality and a freedom of worship the question of reform of a succession was submitted for discussion. Final approval of the new law required receiving a consent of all 16 member states of the British Commonwealth of Nations where the British monarch formally is head of state.
On October 28, 2011 at the Commonwealth summit heads of state and government of the organization approved changes in rules of inheritance of the British throne. New rules cancel tradition of the British monarchy a man's succession. Now the first child who born at a monarchical couple regardless of a floor will be considered as the successor. The principle according to which future British monarch couldn't contact marriage with Catholics is also cancelled.
In April, 2013 in Great Britain the Act of a succession, putting in reform action, was adopted as the law. But it won't come into force if all 16 countries of the Commonwealth disagree on the same changes under the mandative act of the deputy the prime minister Nick Klegga as the lord of the chairman of Privy Council.
In the long term changes in rules of inheritance of the British throne will mean that William's first child and his spouse Catharine, irrespective of a floor can become the third in turn on the British throne after prince Welsh Charles and duke Cambridge William. In that case the younger son of prince Charles, prince Harry, will take only the fourth place.
On June 7, 2013 professors Genevieve Motard and Patrick Teyllon, experts in a constitutional law at Laval's university in the Canadian province of Quebec, submitted the claim to the Supreme court of Quebec. According to their statement, the Canadian government worked unconstitutionally, without having got approval of each of ten provinces of the country before agreeing on changes of the law on a succession. Consideration of their business which, as expected, will borrow from six months to five years, threatens to break efforts of leaders of the British Commonwealth of Nations on fast change of the law.
Because of the judicial claim the first child of prince William and duchess Cambridge Catharine can not inherit a throne in case the girl is born.
Now (data for July 20, 2013), according to the existing Act of a succession of 1701, after queen Elizabeth II inheritance of a throne happens in the following order:
1 . Charles Phillip Arthur George, the prince Welsh (Charles Philip Arthur George, Prince of Wales), was born in 1948, the eldest son of queen Elizabeth II, the successor of a throne (future king Charles III);
2 . William Arthur Phillip Luis, the duke Cambridge (William Arthur Philip Louis, Duke of Cambridge), was born in 1982, the son of the prince Welsh (future king Wilhelm V);
3 . Prince Henry (Harry) Charles Albert David (Prince Henry (Harry) of Charles Albert David), was born in 1984, the son of the prince Welsh;
4 . Andrew Albert Christian Edward (prince Andrew), the duke of York (Andrew Albert Christian Edward, Duke of York), was born in 1960, the son of queen Elizabeth II;
5 . Princess York Beatrice (Beatrice Elizabeth Mary of York), was born in 1988, the daughter of the duke of York;
6 . Princess York Eugenia (Eugenie Victoria Helena of York), was born in 1990, the daughter of the duke of York;
7 . Edward Anthony Richard Luis (prince Edward), columns Uesseksky (Edward Antony Richard Louis, Earl of Wessex), was born in 1964, the son of queen Elizabeth II;
8 . James Windsor, viscount Severn (James Windsor, Viscount Severn), was born in 2007, the son of count Uesseksky;
9 . Lady Louise Windsor (Lady Louise Windsor), was born in 2003, the daughter the column Uesseksky;
10 . The princess of Great Britain Anna Elizabeth Alice Louise (Princess Royal Anne Elizabeth Alice Louise), was born in 1950, the daughter of queen Elizabeth II;
11 . Peter Phillips (Peter Mark Andrew Phillips), was born in 1977, the son of the princess of Great Britain;
12 . The savanna Phillips (Savannah Phillips), was born in 2010, Peter Phillips's daughter;
13 . Ayla Phillips (Isla Phillips), Peter Phillips's daughter was born in 2012;
14 . Zara Phillips (Zara Anne Elizabeth, мrs. Michael Tindall), was born in 1981, the daughter of the princess of Great Britain.
The prince who born on July 22, 2013 Cambridge, the son of the duke and Cambridge William and Catharine's duchess, became the third in turn on the British throne after the grandfather of prince Charles and the father of prince William.
More than 50 years' reign of English queen Elizabeth II made it a peculiar symbol of an era of the XX-XXI centuries. She not only sits on a throne more, than any of acting kings of Europe, but also is the last representative of "old school" monarchs: she carefully adheres to century traditions and ceremonies. Without departing from etiquette rules, its Majesty doesn't give interview to the press. She makes through mass media only addresses to the people. Communication between monarkhiny and journalists carries out press office of the Buckingham palace which is headed by the personal press secretary of queen Penny Russell-Smith.
By the way, if in 1936 king Edward VIII didn't abdicate because of love to "the woman of an ignoble origin" and his brother didn't become the king (and the father of the present queen) George VI, probably, we never would hear the name Elizabeths II. Of course — destiny.