3. To select educational means and
types of tasks which possess the development potential of reflection
and communication [Алмабекова О. АREFLECTION AND COMMUNICATION
IN TEACHING ENGLISH].
Reflection is analyzing something
by means of reflection, studying and comparison (G. Schmidt).
Comprehending educational activity
in CLIL lessons, the pupil focuses attention both on "cognitive"
activity products, and on structure of the activity. The reflection
helps pupils to formulate received results, to define the further purposes
of work, to correct an educational strategy. The reflection is connected
with a goal-setting.
Reflection can be done in any stage
of lesson. The following can be exposed to educational reflection:
1 . Mood, emotional state, feelings
proceeding in this or that educational situation. It is expedient at
the beginning of a lesson for the purpose to establish an emotional
contact with pupils.
2. Activity of learners that gives
the chance of judgment the ways and working methods with a studying
material. In CLIL this type of reflexive activity can be done
in checking homework.
3. Content of learning material.
It is used for identification of level of understanding the content
of material.
The formation reflexive competence
in CLIL classroom helps learners:
- to master language skills through
methods of reflection;
- to activize reflexive activity
at lesson.
In the process of CLIL, educational
(воспитательная) function is also occupied:
- the increase of motivation to learn
the "content" of subject;
- the formation of Intercultural
Communication.
In CLIL learner possesses self-knowledge,
self-cognition, self-evaluation and self- control, letting through the
information.
2.2. CLIL and interactive technologies.
Successful language learning can be achieved when
students have the opportunity to receive instruction, and at the same
time experience real-life situations in which they can acquire the language.
CLIL is a tool for intercultural learning. Expressing yourself in a
language other than the mother tongue is a path towards intercultural
development. In Kazakhstan schools CLIL approach is quite a new idea,
but it is very motivating for both teachers and students.
Project-based learning
Project work is not a new methodology. Its benefits
have been widely recognized for many years in the teaching of subjects
like science, geography, and history. So some teachers have been doing
project work in their language lessons for a long time.
A project is an extended task which usually integrates
language skills work through a number of activities. These activities
involve working towards an agreed goal and may include planning, the
gathering of information through reading, listening, interviewing, etc.,
discussion and processing of the information, problem solving, and oral
or written reporting, and display. Project-based learning has been promoted
within ELT for a number of reasons. Learners' use of language as they
negotiate plans, analyze, and discuss information and ideas is determined
by genuine communicative needs. At the school level, project work encourages
imagination and creativity, self-discipline and responsibility, collaboration,
research and study skills, and cross-curricular work through exploitation
of knowledge gained in other subjects.
Pupils do not feel that English is a chore, but it
is a means of communication and enjoyment. They can experiment with
the language as something real, not as something that only appears in
books. Project work captures better than any other activity
the three principal elements of the communicative approach. These are:
- concern for motivation, that is, how the learners
relate to the task;
- concern for relevance, that is, how the learners
relate to the language;
- concern for educational values, that is, how the
language curriculum relates to the general educational development
of the learner.
Firstly, project work is very personal. Secondly,
project work is a very active medium. It is a kind of structured playing.
Students do not just receive and produce words, but they also learn
through doing.
Integration of language with
other skills
To distinguish CLIL from ELT we could say that ELT
focuses on learning the language, whereas CLIL focuses on learning trough
English.
Project work creates connections between the foreign
language and the learner’s own world. It encourages the use of a wide
range of communicative skills, enables learners to exploit other fields
of knowledge, and provides opportunities for them to write about the
things that are important in their own lives. It is widely recognized
that one of the most important benefits of learning a foreign language
is the opportunity to learn about other cultures. However, it is important,
particularly with an international language like English, that this
is not a one-way flow.
The purpose of learning a foreign language is to
make communication between two cultures possible. English, as an international
language, should not be just for talking about the ways of the English
speaking world. It should also be a means of telling the world about
your own culture. Project work helps to create this approach.
Although project work is not limited
to contend based learning, it can, however, provide an excellent opportunity
for children to synthesise content area knowledge, language and skills.
Project work can be carried out with almost with all ages and levels,
and allow teachers and children to bring together content and language
in a personalized and meaningful way. It can be used to consolidate
information from different parts of the curriculum very naturally and,
at the same time, enables children to acquire skills such as how to
research information, how to select information and how to present and
communicate findings [Nina Lauder "CLIL in primary classroom"
2008].
Projects and CLIL have a lot in common.
They both:
- integrate language and skills;
- involve the use of functional language,
which is dictated by the topics being investigated and studied;
- shift away from "language-driven"
approach by presenting and working with English in a natural, realistic
context;
- give children the opportunity to
use English beyond the realms of the language class;
- provide a variety of stimuli for
distinct learning styles, learners and levels [CLIL with children. Nina
Lauder, 2008].
Creative Technologies
(brainstorming) and CLIL.
Many teachers avoid brainstorming,
as they associate it with noise or discipline problems. This may
be true at the outset, but once you seehow it works and how much fun
it can be.
Brainstorming is the challenge is
to help students channel their energy and use it in an organised way.
Brainstorming should never turn into criticism. Perhaps the most precise
definition of brainstorming is: “All ideas that come up before any
discussion or judgment takes place.
The average learner finds it difficult
to come up with a variety of ideas in response to a problem. However,
the child feels less pressured and less alone when working in a group
and is much more likely to come up with different ideas, solutions and
connections.
The advantages of brainstorming in
CLIL are twofold. With respect to language and content it will
provide:
• a natural situation for communicating
in English.
• an opportunity to actively use
and revise content vocabulary.
• a chance to learn new concepts
or vocabulary from other students.
Yet, brainstorming goes beyond language
and content teaching. Students also learn how to:
• really listen to others.
• negotiate and be tolerant towards
different opinions.
• develop critical thinking skills.
All these are ‘real-life skills’.
Our learners –future managers, scientists, salespeople, artists, journalists–
will remember with gratitude the teacher who taught them how to use
and develop these vital interpersonal communication skills.
Information
and communications technology and CLIL.
There is no doubt that ICT have had an enormous impact
in education in general and in language learning in particular. This
paper draws the readers’ notice to the Web, the Internet, Multimedia
and Concordancers. A large number of benefits are attributed to these
educational technologies, according to the relevant literature. Among
many others one could list the following:
- enhanced levels of motivation;
- students active participation and self-expression;
- opportunities for:
authentic language use;
increased language
input and output;
increased learner
participation;
using the target
language in meaningful situation;
students' collaboration
and socialization;
developing language and
intercultural awareness;
working across the curriculum,
etc.[ Peterson, 1997; Singal, 1997; Slaouti, 1997; Somekh
& Davis, 1997; Warschauer & Whittaker, 1997 etc]
The Web caters for authentic input in the English
language and, therefore, CLIL students can use online resources to work
on different non linguistic subjects without needing to resort exclusively
to course books. Learning can be organized on the basis of educational
materials that are available online and are reviewed, enriched and improved
regularly. An example of a site with educational material that can be
accessed free of charge is the “BBC schools learning resources for
home and school” (http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/). The site provides activities for CLIL pre school
and primary school learners on a variety of subjects such as geography, history, literacy, music, numeracy, science, etc.,
as well as materials and activities for CLIL secondary school students
such as art, business studies, citizenship, design and technology, English,
geography, history, math, music, PE, science, etc. The materials are
presented in the most fascinating way through Multimedia, i.e. there
is sound, video and animation. The students can either work individually
in the classroom and at home or cooperate in groups at school. The activities
are graded according to subject and difficulty, and target at developing
all students’ intelligences and learning styles.
Web quest and project work constitute another blended
learning methodology that can be very effective in CLIL. There is a
wide range of sites in the Web providing information on a significant
number of topics for study. Students can access Wikipedia, which is
a Web based free content encyclopaedia, to retrieve and to elaborate
information. Wikipedia, which is written collaboratively by volunteers
from all around the world, has grown into one of the largest reference
sites and includes more than 10.000.000 articles in more than 250 languages.
It is continually updated and includes topics on art, biography, geography,
history, mathematics, science, society, technology, etc. Furthermore,
except from Wikipedia, there is a selection of official sites with information
which have the advantage of being delivered through Multimedia. CLIL
students can work individually or collaboratively to gather information
to make power point presentations in the classroom, to fill in questionnaires,
to create posters to be exhibited in the classroom, to compose postings
to upload in the Internet, etc.
Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) via the Internet
includes synchronous technologies (Internet Relay Chat, MSN or Yahoo
Messenger, MOOs, 3D environments etc) and asynchronous (email, forum
areas or bulletin boards and discussion lists, etc.). Our attention
in this paper is focused on platforms of communication which may be
used for CLIL students’ collaboration. These platforms can cater for
either or both synchronous and asynchronous collaboration, and can be
supported by a number of mobile devices (wireless laptops, mobile phones,
digital interactive TVs, iPods etc). It is up to the CLIL teacher and
students to decide on which mode of communication (synchronous, asynchronous
or both) and which devices they will select for their interaction.
The platforms can be used for the creation of online
collaborative projects in which CLIL students can communicate with other
students on a national or an international level to exchange information,
to elaborate issues of common interest and to create common digital
materials that are published in the Web, so that they can expand their
knowledge in various school subjects and develop intercultural awareness.
The target language is the vehicle of communication and the benefits
in terms of language learning are considerable. It is reported in the
literature that CMC via the Internet provides a context for authentic
communication as it offers a feeling of reality and a purpose for language
production; it enables the teachers to supplement curriculum work with
online discussions; it enhances autonomous learning and promotes equal
opportunities for participation in the learning procedures, since the
shy students are given more chances to interact with others through
online collaboration (Warschauer, 1996 and 1998, etc.).
Critical thinking and CLIL.
Critical thinking is usually described as "thinking
about". It involves reasoning and reflecting in teaching and learning
experience. Critical thinking is one of the leading technologies that
should be developed in students. Critical thinking is an approach to
conceptualizing information from observation, experience, reflection
or reasoning. Then it can be basis for action, activity in learning.
The role of critical thinking in CLIL classroom can
be hardly overvalued. Critical thinking is the ability to question information,
to analyze and synthesize information from a number of sources in order
to develop the ability to go beyond given information, to create new
way of thinking about ideas.
Psychologist Deane F. Halpern considers critical
thinking as cognitive approach to strategies which a desired outcome.
In CLIL it helps to integrate new perspectives in learning. Critical
thinking involves:
- gathering relevant information;
- evaluating and analyzing experience;
- making generalization and conclusion;
- drawing assumptions;
- identifying problems and finding possible solutions.
CLIL helps to develop necessary skill and habits
of critical thinking, and motivate learners curiosity. Critical thinking
skills and process include:
- enquiring knowledge through observation;
- taking into account the context;
- applying relevant criteria for making judgment;
- collecting and sorting information;
- evaluating primary sources;
- comparing and discussing, making and generalization;
- making reports, essays, etc.
2.3. Learning
strategies in CLIL.
The basic school provides a bridge
from the primary school on the one hand and the profile school on the
other hand. This stage of schooling has very many characteristics in
the psycho-pedagogical aspects of pupils' development. All of these
are closely rebuild in FLTM at this stage in the following:
- the increasing role of communicative-cognitive
orientation of FLT;
- the growth of motivation to FL;
- the increasing role of competence
approach;
- individualization and differences
in FLT;
- integration of all speech activities;
- reflective self-regulation, self-control;
- interconnection of FL subject with
other school subjects (CLIL);
- Language Learning Strategies (LLS)
become an integral part of FLL and FLT aimed at ICC.
Since language learning is active
and it is realized through cooperation and exploration, CLIL students’
attention needs to be drawn to strategic competence -the
development of compensation strategies that enable them to overcome
linguistic barriers in the FL and express themselves adequately, using
rephrasing, alternative expressions, body language, etc.
Research into LLS began in the 1960
. The development in cognitive psychology influenced much of the research
done on LLS.
Rubin started doing research focusing
on the strategies of successful learners and stated that once identified
such strategies could be made available to less successful learners.
The term LLS has been defined by
many researchers. Different ‘learning strategies’ (LS) definitions
have been used in second or foreign language learning context. Tarone
defined LS as the attempts to develop “linguistic and sociolinguistic
competence in the target language -- to incorporate these into one's
interlanguage competence.” Weinstein and Mayer defined learning strategies
broadly as “behaviours and thoughts that a learner engages in during
learning” which are “intended to influence the learner's encoding
process” . Later, Mayer, more specifically, defined LS as “behaviours
of a learner that are intended to influence how the learner processes
information” . Weinstein et al. outlined LS in more detail: “learning
strategies are considered to be any behaviours or thoughts that facilitate
encoding in such a way that knowledge integration and retrieval are
enhanced. More specifically, these thoughts and behaviours constitute
organized plans of action designed to achieve a goal. Examples of learning
strategies include actively rehearsing, summarizing, paraphrasing, imaging,
elaborating, and outlining”. Rubin later defined LLS as those strategies
that “contribute to the development of the language system which the
learner constructs and affect learning directly”. Language Learning
strategies for R. Oxford, are “specific actions, behaviours,
steps, or techniques that students (often intentionally) use to improve
their progress in developing FL skills. These strategies can facilitate
the internalisation, storage, retrieval, or use of the new language.
Strategies are tools for the self-directed involvement necessary for
developing communicative ability.” The definitions referred to above
illustrate that there has been a clear change of how scholars in the
field see learning strategies. They began to focus on the product of
leaning strategies, particularly in the linguistic or sociolinguistic
competence aspects; later on, they meant to pay more consideration to
the learning process itself and this appears from how language learning
strategies are classified.
All language learner use LLS either
consciously or unconsciously when processing new information and performing
tasks in the language. So, the usage of LLS is indispensable.
There are different approaches to
classification of LLS. According to Rubin there are 3 types of
strategic use by learners that contribute directly to language learning:
1) learning strategies:
a) cognitive learning strategies:
- clarification / verification
- guessing / inductive inferencing
- deductive reasoning
- practice
- memorization
- monitoring
b) metacognitive learning strategies:
- planning
- prioritising
- setting goals
- self-management
2)communication strategies;
3)social strategies.
R. Oxford distinguished 62 LLS. She
divided them into 2 groups: direct and indirect.
1) Direct strategies:
a) memory-related:
-creating mental linkages
-applying images and sounds
-reviewing well
-employing action
b) cognitive
-practising
-receiving and sending messages strategies
-analysing and reasoning
-creating structure for input and output
c) compensation strategies:
-guessing intelligently
-overcoming limitations in speaking and writing
2) Indirect strategies:
a) metacognitive strategies:
-centering your learning
-arranging and planning your learning
-evaluating your learning
b) affective strategies:
-lowering your anxiety
-encouraging yourself
-taking your emotional temperature
c) social strategies:
-asking questions
-cooperating with others
-empathizing with others.
There are 3 types of Models of Learning Strategies.
1) Learning as storage.
The aim of this model is reproduction, no creation. It includes different
types of drills, repetitions, practice learning, multiple choice testing,
use of pictures, music applications, schemes, body language, etc. It
includes no cognitive strategies, but only memory-related strategies.
2) Learning as processing.
The aim is to product and create. The model suggests cognitive strategies:
analyzing, summarizing, transforming, substitution, categorizing, grouping.
3) Learning as constructing.
The aim of model is to produce and construct own speech. It includes
problem-solving tasks, projects, pragma-professional tasks, round table.
This model suggests cognitive, meta-cognitive, social strategies.
Metacognitive strategies have a higher order function which entails
planning, monitoring and evaluating a learning activity. They regulate
learning and are applicable to a wide variety of tasks. Cognitive strategies
are the steps used in learning or problem-solving that require direct
analysis or transformation of learning materials. They are more directly
linked to performance on a particular learning task. Social-affective
strategies are ways in which learners interact with others or control
their emotional state to assist learning.
The current consensus is that there are no “good” or “bad”
strategies but a strategy can be used effectively or ineffectively in
a given context. Teachers and learners in a CLIL context can benefit
from a knowledge of strategies, particularly at the beginning of a course.
For the teacher strategies will help to convey input, focusing on, not
only the final goal of learning but the process or steps towards getting
there. A strategic approach also ensures that learners are challenged
at different levels of cognitive complexity, using differnt thinking
skills. For learners an awareness of strategies can help them plan,
monitor and evaluate their learning and become more active, reflective
and so autonomous learners who understand more fully what the learning
process entails (Benson, 2001; Holec, 1981; Little, 1991).
In the early stages of CLIL teachers should emphasise receptive skills
(reading and listening) and allow learners to respond in FL, FL2 or
by non-verbal responses to instructions. Here are some examples of strategies
that students can be taught for reading and listening:
a. Reading
looking at titles, headings and illustrations to
predict the contents of the text
thinking about what you already know about the subject
scanning for specific information
skimming for a general idea
using the context to guess the meaning of unknown
words
using a dictionary to find out the meaning of unknown
words
looking at prefixes and suffixes to understand parts
of speech
thinking about the most important points in the text
thinking about the topic of each paragraph
distinguishing the main ideas from supporting points
understanding techniques for giving examples, paraphrasing,
making connections
identifying the writer’s opinion or attitude
identifying logical arguments