Автор работы: Пользователь скрыл имя, 30 Апреля 2013 в 18:58, курсовая работа
Цель курсового проекта “Выбор оптимального варианта отфрахтования судна и составление проекта чартера” – закрепление и расширение знаний, приобретенных при изучении коммерческой работы флота, развитие навыков анализа фрахтовой конъюнктуры, осмысление процесса принятия решений при заключении фрахтовой сделки, оценка своих действий по конечному результату.
Основная задача курсового проекта – выбор и экономическое обоснование оптимального (по предлагаемым категориям) предложения по отфрахтовке конкретного судна по ряду оферт различных фрахтователей и составление проекта чартера на основе типовых проформ.
На основе полученных расчетов по каждой выбранной оферте производим отбор оптимальной оферты. Для этого сделаем графики, по которым можно будет выполнить сравнительный анализ основных экономических показателей.
Обоснование выбора оптимальной оферты
Выбор оптимальной оферты целесообразно производить по наиболее значительным экономическим показателям, причём рассматривать их необходимо в комплексе, а не по отдельности. Так, например, такие показатели как доходы и расходы, будь то инвалютные или приведённые сами по себе, мало о чём говорят, тогда как финансовый результат характеризует оба предыдущих показателя. Он показывает превышают ли доходы расходы или наоборот, указывая величину превышения.
Итак, наиболее высокий финансовый результат отмечен в оферте № 39, который равен –149177,17$. Так же по этой же оферте самая большая прибыль и сумма фрахта 149916,47$ и 427815,87$, соответственно.. А ТЧЭ по 39 оферте равен 5141,006 меньше чем в плановом ТЧЭ(7500) это означает что судно не довыполнило план. В офертах №40 и №61 наблюдается отрицательная прибыль от эксплуатации и финансовый результат. Это означает что эти оферты не эффективны для работы судна.
Сравнивая оставшиеся оферты №22 и №23 наиболее эффективная является оферта №22 которой финансовый результат составляет 124681,16 $,а прибыль от эксплуатации 125420,46. А ТЧЭ составляет 7495,4$ это означает что судно не довыполнит план на 4,6$
Мы знаем, что
главной целью любой
На основании приведенных выше показателей делаем вывод, что оферта № 22 является самой приемлемой. И поэтому по условиям именно этой оферты составляем чартер на рейс Новороссийск – Таранто –удобрения (20573т.).
Анализ выполнения плана работы судов при работе по оптимальной оферте
; (31)
где rбр – процент брокерской комиссии.
Оферта № 1 : f =( 7500*42,93+253295)/20573*(1-4,
åFинв.=29,27*20573-0,045*29,
ТЧЭ=(575073,99-253295)/42,93=
Оферта № 2 : f = ( 7500*34,77+247797,8)/19950*(1-
åFинв.= 26,69 *19950-0,045*26,69 *19950=508504,6
ТЧЭ=(508504,6-247797,8)/34,77=
Оферта № 3 : f =( 7500*35,76+249681,2)/22287,3*(
åFинв.= 22,1 *22287,3-0,045*22,1 *22287,3=470384,6
ТЧЭ=(470384,6-249681,2)/42,93=
Оферта № 4 : f =( 7500*37,59+293911,8)/20642,2*(
åFинв.= 26,64 *20642,2-0,045*26,64 *20642,2=525162,3
ТЧЭ=(525162,3-293911,8)/37,59=
В оферте №5 ТЧЭ (10131,7) превышает плановый ТЧЭ (7500)
Используя реквизиты оптимальной оферты, рассматривалась наливная группа чартеров, на основе которых впоследствии составлялся чартер.
Далее в отобранной группе сравнивались вторые части чартеров по статьям и обосновывался выбор лучшего с позиции судовладельца.
Проформа лучшего чартера заполняется в соответствии с исходными данными оптимальной оферты ( на англ. языке ).
TANKER VOYAGE CHARTER PARTY
Skigda
---------------------------
Place
IT IS THIS DAY MUTUALLY AGREED
between____NOVOROSSIISK
Owner (hereinafter called
the “Owner”) of the_________
PART I
A. Description and Position :
Deadweight:________55870
___ in draft in salt water on assigned summer freeboard
Capacity for cargo:___ 49000________tons
____10____% more or less, Vessel’s option.
Classed:________ ______Coiled_____________
Last two cargoes:________ oil___________________
Now:__________________gruid oil_______________Expected ready:____
B: Laydays:_____16.09__
Cancelling:______24.9__
C. Loading port(s):__________Bizerte_
D. Discharging port(s):_______Ravena_________
E.Cargo:_______________ _gruid oil ____________________
Charterer’s option
F. Freight Rate:____________10.1$ per tonn___________
G. Freight Payable to:___________________________
H. Total Laytime in Running Hours:____________________
J. Demurrage per Day:_____10000________________
K. Commission of___________3.75______% is payable by Owner to__
on the actual amount of freight, when and as freight is paid.
L,Special Provisions:___________________
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Charterer, consisting of
a Preamble, Parts I and II, to be executed in duplicate as of the day and year
first above written.
Witness:
By:
Witness: By:
PART 2
1.WARRANTY
(a) The Owners shall, before and at the commencement of the voyage, exercise due diligence to make the Vessel seaworthy, properly manned, equipped, and supplied for and during the voy able expense; otherwise, Owner has the option of cancelling this Charter in which case no responsibility shall rest with the Vessel, Owners, or Agents.
Статья взята из проформы VEGOILVOY, так как именно в этой проформе наиболее четко сформулированы обязанности судовладельца по отношению к судну. В статье подразумевается, что если танк или танки при испытании оказывается неисправным, судовладелец обязуется произвести ремонт с тем условием, что ремонт может быть произведен в течение 24 ч и по разумной цене.
В других сравниваемых чартерах таких оговорок нет.
2 VOYAGE
The vessel shall proceed with all convenient despatch as soon as her prior commitments, as specified in Part I are completed, to a berth, dock, anchorage, submarine line, alongside a lighter or lighters or any other plase as ordered by Charterers within the limits specified in Part I, or so near thereto as she may safely get, lie and depart from, and there load, always afloat, the cargo as described in Part I and being so loaded shall proceed as ordered on signing bills of lading direct to a berth, lock, anchorage, submarine line, alongside a lighter or lighters or any other place as ordered by Charterers within the limits specified in Part I or so near thereto as she may safely get and lie, and there deliver the cargo always afloat. Should it appear that the aforesaid conditions for ship and cargo are not fulfilled, the ship shall not be obliged to proceed.Charterers shall exercise due diligence to ascertain that any places to which they order the vessel are sage for the vessel and that she will lie there always afloat. Charterers shall, however, not be deemed to warrant the safety of any place and shall be under no liability in respect thereof except for loss or damage caused by their failure to exercise due diligence as aforesaid.
Статья взята из проформы INTERTANKVOY, так как в этом чартере кроме общих формулировок присутствует оговорка о том, что фрахтователи обязаны гарантировать безопасность любого места. Так же фрахтователи должны предоставить все дополнительное оборудование для перекачки нефти и возместить судовладельцам суммы всех дополнительных страховых премий. Проформы STB VOY, ASBATANKVOY, SHELLVOY таких оговорок не имеют, а в VEGOILVOY такая статья вообще отсутствует.
3,E.T.A.
The master shall radio to agents at loading port and to Charterers at least 72 hours prior to arrival advising the vessel's approximate date and hour of arrival
at loading port, failing which Charterers shall be allowed an additional 24 hours under clause 14 hereof.
The master shall also radio to Charterers immediately after departure from the loading port advising the vessel's expected time of arrival at discharging port or
point of orders and shall again radio to Charterers 72 hours before the vessel is due at the discharging port or at point of orders, inboth cases stating also expected draft on even keel.
The master shall also radio to agents at discharging port at least 72 hours prior to arrival advising the vessel's approximate date and hour of arrival at discharging port stating also expected draft on even keel, failing which Charterers shall be allowed an additional 24 hours under clause 14 hereof.
Any alteration in expected dates or time of arrival exceeding 12 hours should be advised promptly by wireless to Charterers and agents.
Эта статья взята из проформы чартера ФИНАВОЙ , она похожа во всех рассматриваемых чартерах.
4,Heating of cargo
Owners undertake thai, if required, the cargo shall be heated up to and maintained at a temperature consistent with clause 1 (e) hereof, on passage to and whilst at the discharging port or ports in accordance with instructions given by the cargo suppliers at the loading port or ports, or by Charterers prior to loading or, provided Owners have been given reasonable notice in advance, en route to the discharging port or ports.
Эта статья взята из проформы чартера ФИНАВОЙ, в этой проформе по моему мнению наиболее лучше описаны права судовладельца и его обязанности. По сравнению с другими проформами чартеров.
5,TOVALOP
Owners warrant that the vessel is a participating tanker in TOVALOP and will so remain during the currency of this Charter, provided however, that if
Owners acquire the right to withdraw from TOVALOP under clause VIII thereof, nothing herein shall prevent Owners from exercising ,that right.
When an escape or discharge of oil (the term "oil" for the purposes of this clause meaning "oil" as defined in TOVALOP) occurs from the vessel and causes or threatens to cause pollution damage to coastlines, charterers may, at their option, upon notice to Ownersor master, under take such measures as are reasonably necessary to prevent or mitigate such damage, unless Owners promptly undertake same. Charterers shall keep Owners advised of the nature and result of any such measurestaken by them, and if time permits, the nature of the measures
intended to be taken by them. Any of the aforementioned measures taken by Charterers shall be deemed taken on Owners' authority and shall be at Owners' expense except to the extent that:
(a) such escape or discharge was caused or contributed to by , Charterers, or
(b) Owners are or would have been exempt from liability for such
escape or discharge by reason of
the exceptions prescribed in
Article 111(2), of the 1969
International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage,
or
(c) the cost of such measures together with Owners' own reasonable removal costs exceed One
Hundred and Twenty Five US dollars per Gross Registered Ton of the vessel or Ten Million US dollars (whichever is less) in case the vessel was carrying a
cargo of oil not owned by Oil Company party to CRISTAL {as such ownership is defined in CRISTAL and the Rules promulgated thereunder) or in case the Vessel was in ballast, provided always that if Owners in their absolute discretion consider
said measures should be discontinued, Owners shall so notify Charterers and thereafter Charterers shall have no right to continue said measures under the provisions of this clause and further liability to Charterers under this clause shall thereupon cease. The above provisions are not in derogation of such other rights as
Charterers or Owners may have under this Charter, or may otherwise have or acquire by Law or any International Convention.
Эта статья взята из проформы чартера ФИНАВОЙ, так как ранее не встречал её других чартерах.
По этой статье четко определяются права и обязанности судовладельца и фрахтователя относительно загрязнения нефтью мирового океана. По моему мнению эта статья необходим для рейса , совершаемого по данной оферте.
6,War Risks
(A) The master shall not be required or bound
lo sign Bills of Lading for any blockaded port or for any port
which the master or Owners in his or their discretion consider dangerous
or impossible to enter or reach.
(B) (i) if any loading or discharging port to which the vessel may properly be ordered under the provisions of this Charter or Bills of Lading issued pursuant to
this Charter be blockaded, or if owing to any war, hostilities, warlike operations, civil war, civil commotions, revolutions, or the operation of international law (a) entry to any such loading or discharging port or the loading or discharging of cargo at any such port be considered by the master or Owners in his or their discretion dangerous or prohibited or (b) it be considered by the master or Owners in his or their discretion dangerous or impossible or prohibited for
the vessel to reach any such loading or discharging port.
within the range of loading or discharging ports respectively established under the provisions of this Charter (provided such other port is not blockaded or that entry thereto or loading or discharging of cargo thereat or reaching the same is not in the master's or Owners' duscretion dangerous or prohibited), if, in respect of
a discharging port no orders be received from Charterers within 48 hours after they or their agents have received from Owners a request for the nomination of
a substitute port, Owners shall then be at liberty to discharge the cargo at any port which they
or the master in their or his discretion decide on (whether within
the range of discharging ports established under the provisions
of this Charter or not) and such discharging shall be deemed to be due
fulfilment of the contract or contracts of affreigtment so far as cargo
so discharged is concerned.
In the event of the cargo being loaded or discharged at any such other port within the respective range of loading or discharging ports established under
the provisions of this Charter, this Charter shall be read in respect of freight and all other conditions whatsoever as if the voyage performed were that originally nominated. However, if the vessel discharges the cargo at a port outside the range of discharging ports established under he provisions of this Charter,freight shall be paid as for the voyage originally nominated and all extra expenses involved
in reaching the actual discharging port and/or discharging the cargo thereat shall be paid by Charterers. In this latter event Owners shall have a lien on the
cargo for all such extra expenses.
recommendations as to departure, arrival, routes, pom of cart, stoppages, destinations, zones, waters, delivery or in any other wise тwhatsoever given by the government the nation under whose flag the vessel sails or any other
government or local authority including any de facto government or local authority or by any person or body acting or purporting to act as or with authority of
any such government or authority or by any committee or person having under the terms of the war risks insurance on the vessel the right to give any such directions or recommendations. If by reason of or in compliance with any such directions or recommendations, anything is done or is not done such shall not he deemed a deviation. If by reason of or in compliance with any such directions or
recommendations the vessel does not proceed to the discharging port or ports originally nominated or to which she may have been properly ordered under the provisions of this Charter or Bills of Lading issued
pursuant to this Charter, the vessel may proceed to any discharging port which the master or Owners in his or their discretion may decide on and there discharge
Информация о работе Выбор оптимального варианта отфрахтования судна и составление проекта чартера